CO129-214 - Public Offices & Others - 1883 — Page 419

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

415

Lung.

on

habeas

corpus.

The petition sets forth that he is unlawfully

restrained

of

his liberty and detained

2

on board

of

the

ship "Oceanic" by its Captain in the harbor

of San Francisco; that the alleged ground of

his detention

is that he comes within the Act of Congress of May 6

1882 to execute certain treaty stipulations relating to

the Chinese. The petitioner is a Chinese by race,

language,

and

color and has all the peculiarities of the subjects of China.

He is also

a laborer, but he

was born on

Hong Kong after it was ceded to

Great Britain. He claims, therefore, to be a British subject

and

as such exempt

from the provisions of the Act to which the petitioner

owes

allegiance. Undoubtedly the Courts will always construe legislation in harmony

with treaty stipulations, where its sole purpose is to

carry those stipulations into effect. It will not be

presumed,

in the absence

of

clear

language,

that Congress intended to

disregard

or

abrogate any

of the clauses of a treaty with a foreign Government.

At the same time,

an Act

of Congress must be construed according to its manifest

intent, and so far

as

the Courts are concerned must

be enforced. A treaty is in its nature a contract between

two nations, and by writers

on the subject is generally

treated as having by itself the force of

public law.

The Constitution

of

the United States, however, places

both treaties and laws made in pursuance thereof

on the same footing.

But for this

fact of birth

in the British dominions it is conceded that he would

be within the provisions of the Act. Does this fact

take him out of them? The answer to this question depends

upon

the meaning of the Act and not

upon

Edit History

2026-05-24 05:18:58 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
415 Lung. on habeas corpus. The petition sets forth that he is unlawfully restrained of his liberty and detained 2 on board of the ship "Oceanic" by its Captain in the harbor of San Francisco; that the alleged ground of his detention is that he comes within the Act of Congress of May 6 1882 to execute certain treaty stipulations relating to the Chinese. The petitioner is a Chinese by race, language, and color and has all the peculiarities of the subjects of China. He is also a laborer, but he was born on Hong Kong after it was ceded to Great Britain. He claims, therefore, to be a British subject and as such exempt from the provisions of the Act to which the petitioner owes allegiance. Undoubtedly the Courts will always construe legislation in harmony with treaty stipulations, where its sole purpose is to carry those stipulations into effect. It will not be presumed, in the absence of clear language, that Congress intended to disregard or abrogate any of the clauses of a treaty with a foreign Government. At the same time, an Act of Congress must be construed according to its manifest intent, and so far as the Courts are concerned must be enforced. A treaty is in its nature a contract between two nations, and by writers on the subject is generally treated as having by itself the force of public law. The Constitution of the United States, however, places both treaties and laws made in pursuance thereof on the same footing. But for this fact of birth in the British dominions it is conceded that he would be within the provisions of the Act. Does this fact take him out of them? The answer to this question depends upon the meaning of the Act and not upon
Baseline (Original)
415 Lung. on habeas corpio. The petitionon seto forth that he is unlawfully restrained of his liberty and detained 2 board of the of Alcam Shipp Oceanic" by its Captain in the harbor Can Francisco; that the alleged ground of his detention is that he comes within the Act of Congress of May 6 1982 to execute certain treaty stipulations relating to Chinese" The petitioner is a Chinese by race, language and color and has all the peculiarities of the subjects of China. Ne so also OL laborer, but he was born on Hong Hong after it was ceded to therefore, to be a Prition subject the island of Great Britain. He claimo, and as such exempt to which the petitioner oureo allegiance. Undoubtedly the Courts will always construe legiolation in harmony with treaty stipulations, where its sole purpose is to carry those stipulations into effect. It will not be presumed purport, that Congress intended to in the absence of clear language dionegand to that the require. ent or to an Act a treaty with a foreign Government ments of a abrogate any f its clauses. At the same time. of Congress must be construed according to its manifect intent, and so for as the Courts are concerned must be enforced. A treaty is in ito nature a contract between, tivo nations, and by writero from the Act of Congress. But for this for fact of birth so treated and not осо it legislative Act. take in the British dominions it is conceded that he would be within the provisions of the Act. Does this fact them? The answer to this question depends my 2 public law is generally having by itself the force of Treaties and Laws the United States, however, places .. The Constitution Frum out of of upon the mining of the Act and rot upon the Government both treaties and laws made in pursuance. thereof in. to the S
2026-05-24 05:18:58 · Baseline
View content

415

Lung.

on

habeas

corpio.

The petitionon seto forth that he is unlawfully

restrained

of

his liberty and detained

2

board

of

the

of

Alcam Shipp Oceanic" by its Captain in the harbor

Can Francisco; that the alleged ground of

his detention

is that he comes within the Act of Congress of May 6

1982 to execute certain treaty stipulations relating to

Chinese" The petitioner is a Chinese by race,

language

and

color and has all the peculiarities of the subjects of China.

Ne so

also

OL

laborer, but he

was born on

Hong Hong after it was ceded to

therefore, to be a Prition subject

the island of

Great Britain. He claimo,

and

as such exempt

to which the petitioner

oureo

allegiance. Undoubtedly the Courts will always construe legiolation in harmony

with treaty stipulations, where its sole purpose is to

carry those stipulations into effect. It will not be

presumed

purport, that Congress intended to

in the absence

of

clear

language

dionegand

to that

the

require.

ent or

to

an Act

a treaty with a foreign Government

ments

of a

abrogate any

f

its clauses. At the same time.

of Congress must be construed according to its manifect

intent, and so

for

as

the Courts are concerned must

be enforced. A treaty is in ito nature a contract between,

tivo nations, and by writero

from the Act

of Congress.

But for this

for

fact of birth

so treated and not

осо

it

legislative Act.

take

in the British dominions it is conceded that he would

be within the provisions of the Act. Does this fact

them? The answer to this question depends

my 2

public law is generally

having by itself the force of

Treaties and Laws

the United States, however, places

..

The Constitution

Frum out

of

of

upon

the mining of the Act and rot

upon

the Government

both treaties and laws made in pursuance.

thereof

in.

to

the

S

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.